The Truth Of What Happened In The Case Of Sheikh Abduljabbar Kabara In The Islamic Court I WILL GIVE BAIL SHEIKH MALAM ABDUL-JABBAR KABARA ...

 The Truth Of What Happened In The Case Of Sheikh Abduljabbar Kabara In The Islamic Court

I WILL GIVE BAIL SHEIKH MALAM ABDUL-JABBAR KABARA IF I AM POSSIBLE - SAYS THE JUDGE

The Supreme Court of Islamic Sharia, Judge Ibrahim Sarki Yola, sitting on the South Gate of Kano, on Thursday, 25/11/2021, resumed hearing of the case of Islamic scholar Dr Sheikh Abdujabbar Kabara (H) on charges of making statements. others described it as slanderous and inciting.

At the last hearing, the court asked for a copy of the book Bukhari and Muslim from Bayero University, Kano, which began today with the presentation of the books to the court. The court then asked the teacher if he had been given the money to buy the books as stated in the previous session, the teacher confirmed that he had been given and bought, and thanked him.During today's session, the teacher further questioned the witness, during which he questioned the witness and changed his mind."Is it permissible for a witness to change the subject of his statement?" Said Dr Sheikh Malam Abdujabbar (H).

The witness did not answer yes or no, but said, "I said what I heard was from your mouth."The teacher asked again, "Now that I have started this class, the class is contradicted by the evidence you have given. What is the status of your evidence?""The status of a witness is that of a court of law," the witness said. Here the teacher asked the court to allow him to press the classroom what he said not as the devil said but the public prosecutor criticized the appeal. The teacher questioned the evidence that his student claims to him were untrue, criticizing the evidence he had posted on his Facebook page for years, publishing defamatory remarks about him.

The teacher drew the attention of the court to the fact that he had not "Tahququl Da'awa" before the hearing of the evidence, but the court had informed him that it had been done and that the opportunity given to him in the past was that he had not spoken.

Criticizing the scholar, he quoted a book that the witness had written to him in response to the authenticity of the names of God in the book Dala'ilul Khairati, where the scholar read that the witness on page 2 of the book, referred to him as Mulhidi, son heresy, heresy and mysticism, and heresy.

He told the court that the evidence was his enemy, and that he had not told the court the truth about his association with his student, and that he had joined their class when the witness said he was studying at the Ma'ahad Sheikh Nasir Kabara School. (R) in Gwale. He also showed the court documents written by the witness for more than 7 years mentioning him with unpleasant names, and where it was written on his page that he was an employee of the izala organization (JIBWIS), the teacher alleged that this evidence he would never tell the truth about it.

For his part, the witness told the court that about two months ago he had a minor problem with his Facebook page where he saw that his posts had been changed. "I think this JIBWIS was installed at the time of our intrusion, but I am not a member of JIBWIS," the witness said. Prosecutor Barrister Sa'ida SAN asked the court to allow his colleague Barrister Yakubu Abdullahi to address the criticisms levelled by the teacher, which the court allowed."This criticism of the defendant, if viewed in the light of the law and the judiciary, is unacceptable, considering section 175 sub-section 1 of the Evidence Act 2011," Jacob said.

Defendant's attorney asked the court to allow him to respond to the plaintiff's defence."In Tuhfa, p. 48, it is stated that in Islamic law the evidence is not accepted by the Evidence Act, a witness to his brother becomes a mubarrizi and this evidence is not mubarrizi," Lawyan added. He added that "the Court of Appeal ruled that evidence should not be accepted except from a Muslim, an adult, a righteous person, and that there should be no enmity between him and the respondent, and that he should not be his friend."He further informed the court that the prosecution had erred in quoting from the text of Fawakihuddawani that the evidence of the accused was not accepted. He finally asked the court to dismiss this evidence. Judge Ibrahim Sarki Yola said all the lawyers had stated their case with the law and the text, and he would review them and state the status of this evidence later.

Prior to the conclusion of today's hearing, the respondent's attorneys again asked the court to grant bail to the appellant, considering that his position does not exceed the condition, and he will appear in court whenever required.

The court said it would look into the matter and, if appropriate, grant him bail. The case is being re-assigned to December 9, 2021.